We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter explores SFL views on what (a) semantics can be and how those views of semantics can be understood. First, four basic conceptions of meaning/semantics are specified (what), corresponding to places of ‘meaning’ in the SFL model (where): valeur, stratum, content side, language as a whole as meaning-making. Then, it is argued that semantics can be modelled in three ways (how), viz. as topological, discourse-structural, or higher-level systemic meaning. In order to understand why a level of semantics is recognized in Hallidayan SFL, it is necessary to explore the variability between meaning and lexicogrammar, semantics as an interface stratum, and how this is exploited in grammatical metaphor. For a deeper understanding of semantics as a stratum, then, a wider view must be taken, in two ways: on the one hand, by opening up the time perspective: language is flexible but meta-stable through time ('metaredundancy'); on the other hand, by recognizing specific design features of SFL as an ‘extravagant’ model, i.e. a model which honours multiperspectivism and fractality. Finally, three recent semantic ‘endeavours’ in SFL are explored and explained against the theoretical backdrop sketched in this chapter: Martin’s discourse semantics, Halliday & Matthiessen’s ideation base, and Appraisal theory.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.